South Korea vs Slovenia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

South Korea
65.62
in 2014
Slovenia
65.62
in 2014
South Korea rank
29th
Slovenia rank
29th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • Slovenia
0204060200320082014

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 65.62 against 65.62 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 29th and Slovenia ranks 29th of 181 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 59.38 65.62 6.25 Slovenia
2010s 64.38 65.62 1.25 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, South Korea or Slovenia?
South Korea, at 65.62 against 65.62 in Slovenia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between South Korea and Slovenia?
0, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Slovenia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do South Korea and Slovenia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
South Korea ranks 29th and Slovenia ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.