Kiribati vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Kiribati
65.62
in 2014
Mongolia
65.62
in 2014
Kiribati rank
29th
Mongolia rank
29th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Kiribati
  • Mongolia
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 65.62 against 65.62 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 29th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 65.62 65.62 0
2010s 65.62 65.62 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Kiribati or Mongolia?
Kiribati, at 65.62 against 65.62 in Mongolia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Kiribati and Mongolia?
0, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mongolia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Kiribati and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Kiribati ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.