Kenya vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Kenya
28.12
in 2014
Suriname
28.12
in 2014
Kenya rank
146th
Suriname rank
146th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Kenya
- Suriname
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 28.12 against 28.12 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 28.12 | 12.5 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 33.12 | 28.12 | 5 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Kenya or Suriname?
- Kenya, at 28.12 against 28.12 in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Kenya and Suriname?
- 0, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kenya and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Kenya ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 146th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.