Kazakhstan vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Kazakhstan
53.12
in 2014
Thailand
53.12
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
63rd
Thailand rank
63rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Thailand
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 53.12 against 53.12 in Thailand, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 63rd and Thailand ranks 63rd of 181 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 46.43 53.12 6.7 Thailand
2010s 50.62 53.12 2.5 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Kazakhstan or Thailand?
Kazakhstan, at 53.12 against 53.12 in Thailand as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Kazakhstan and Thailand?
0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Thailand?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Kazakhstan and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Kazakhstan ranks 63rd and Thailand ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.