Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Kazakhstan
53.12
in 2014
Serbia
53.12
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
63rd
Serbia rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 53.12 against 53.12 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.43 | 50.45 | 4.02 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 50.62 | 53.12 | 2.5 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 53.12 against 53.12 in Serbia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.