Jordan vs Sierra Leone: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Jordan
43.75
in 2014
Sierra Leone
43.75
in 2014
Jordan rank
100th
Sierra Leone rank
100th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Jordan
  • Sierra Leone
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 100th and Sierra Leone ranks 100th of 181 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
2000s 43.75 40.62 3.12 Jordan
2010s 43.75 43.12 0.625 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Jordan or Sierra Leone?
Jordan, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Jordan and Sierra Leone?
0, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Sierra Leone?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Jordan and Sierra Leone rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Jordan ranks 100th and Sierra Leone ranks 100th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.