Israel vs Jamaica: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Israel
56.25
in 2014
Jamaica
56.25
in 2014
Israel rank
54th
Jamaica rank
54th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Israel
- Jamaica
How they compare
Israel currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 54th and Jamaica ranks 54th of 181 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.25 | 58.48 | 2.23 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Israel or Jamaica?
- Israel, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Jamaica as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Israel and Jamaica?
- 0, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Jamaica?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Israel and Jamaica rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Israel ranks 54th and Jamaica ranks 54th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.