Ireland vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Ireland
100
in 2014
Singapore
100
in 2014
Ireland rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Ireland
- Singapore
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 100 against 100 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.77 | 100 | 2.23 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Ireland or Singapore?
- Ireland, at 100 against 100 in Singapore as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Ireland and Singapore?
- 0, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Singapore?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Ireland and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Ireland ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.