Indonesia vs Iran: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Indonesia
40.62
in 2014
Iran
40.62
in 2014
Indonesia rank
109th
Iran rank
109th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Indonesia
  • Iran
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 40.62 against 40.62 in Iran, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 109th and Iran ranks 109th of 181 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Iran Difference Ahead
2000s 42.86 40.62 2.23 Indonesia
2010s 40.62 40.62 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Indonesia or Iran?
Indonesia, at 40.62 against 40.62 in Iran as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Indonesia and Iran?
0, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Iran?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Indonesia and Iran rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Indonesia ranks 109th and Iran ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.