India vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

India
21.88
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
21.88
in 2014
India rank
157th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
157th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • India
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
05101520200320082014

How they compare

India currently reports 21.88 against 21.88 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was India ahead.

India ranks 157th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 157th of 181 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 21.88 20 1.88 India
2010s 21.88 21.88 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, India or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
India, at 21.88 against 21.88 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between India and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do India and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
India ranks 157th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.