Grenada vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Grenada
21.88
in 2014
Mauritania
21.88
in 2014
Grenada rank
157th
Mauritania rank
157th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Grenada
  • Mauritania
05101520200320082014

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 21.88 against 21.88 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 157th and Mauritania ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 20 20.62 0.625 Mauritania
2010s 21.88 21.88 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Grenada or Mauritania?
Grenada, at 21.88 against 21.88 in Mauritania as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Grenada and Mauritania?
0, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Grenada and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Grenada ranks 157th and Mauritania ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.