Finland vs Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Finland
59.38
in 2014
Micronesia (country)
59.38
in 2014
Finland rank
44th
Micronesia (country) rank
44th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Finland
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Finland currently reports 59.38 against 59.38 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 44th and Micronesia (country) ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.38 | 59.38 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 59.38 | 59.38 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Finland or Micronesia (country)?
- Finland, at 59.38 against 59.38 in Micronesia (country) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Finland and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Micronesia (country)?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Micronesia (country) rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Finland ranks 44th and Micronesia (country) ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.