Estonia vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Estonia
56.25
in 2014
Tajikistan
56.25
in 2014
Estonia rank
54th
Tajikistan rank
54th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Estonia
  • Tajikistan
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 54th and Tajikistan ranks 54th of 181 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 58.75 56.25 2.5 Estonia
2010s 56.25 56.25 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Estonia or Tajikistan?
Estonia, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Tajikistan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Estonia and Tajikistan?
0, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Tajikistan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Estonia and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Estonia ranks 54th and Tajikistan ranks 54th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.