Estonia vs Jamaica: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Estonia
56.25
in 2014
Jamaica
56.25
in 2014
Estonia rank
54th
Jamaica rank
54th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Estonia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jamaica ahead.
Estonia ranks 54th and Jamaica ranks 54th of 184 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.93 | 58.48 | 0.4464 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Estonia or Jamaica?
- Estonia, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Jamaica as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Estonia and Jamaica?
- 0, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Jamaica?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Estonia and Jamaica rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Estonia ranks 54th and Jamaica ranks 54th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.