Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
40.62
in 2014
Sri Lanka
40.62
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
109th
Sri Lanka rank
109th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 40.62 against 40.62 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Sri Lanka?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 40.62 against 40.62 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 109th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.