Equatorial Guinea vs Spain: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
40.62
in 2014
Spain
40.62
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
109th
Spain rank
109th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Spain
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 40.62 against 40.62 in Spain, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th and Spain ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 36.25 | 4.38 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Spain?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 40.62 against 40.62 in Spain as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Spain?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Spain?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Spain rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th and Spain ranks 109th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.