El Salvador vs Estonia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
El Salvador
56.25
in 2014
Estonia
56.25
in 2014
El Salvador rank
54th
Estonia rank
54th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Estonia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Estonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 54th and Estonia ranks 54th of 181 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.62 | 58.93 | 6.7 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 58.12 | 56.25 | 1.88 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, El Salvador or Estonia?
- El Salvador, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Estonia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between El Salvador and Estonia?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Estonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do El Salvador and Estonia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 54th and Estonia ranks 54th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.