Dominican Republic vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Dominican Republic
59.38
in 2014
United States
60.62
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
44th
United States rank
43rd
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 60.62 against 59.38 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.24.
Across all 12 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 44th and United States ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.38 | 64.29 | 4.91 | United States |
| 2010s | 59.38 | 63.62 | 4.25 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Dominican Republic or United States?
- United States, at 60.62 against 59.38 in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Dominican Republic and United States?
- 1.24, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and United States?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 44th and United States ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.