Dominican Republic vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Dominican Republic
59.38
in 2014
Mauritius
59.38
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
44th
Mauritius rank
44th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Mauritius
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 59.38 against 59.38 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 44th and Mauritius ranks 44th of 181 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 59.38 50.52 8.85 Dominican Republic
2010s 59.38 55 4.38 Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Dominican Republic or Mauritius?
Dominican Republic, at 59.38 against 59.38 in Mauritius as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Dominican Republic and Mauritius?
0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Mauritius?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Dominican Republic and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 44th and Mauritius ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.