Djibouti vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Djibouti
40.62
in 2014
Singapore
100
in 2014
Djibouti rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 100 against 40.62 in Djibouti, a difference of 59.38.
That makes Singapore's figure about 2.5 times Djibouti's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 1 regions.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 100 | 59.38 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 100 | 59.38 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Djibouti or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 100 against 40.62 in Djibouti as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Djibouti and Singapore?
- 59.38, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Djibouti and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.