Denmark vs El Salvador: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Denmark
56.25
in 2014
El Salvador
56.25
in 2014
Denmark rank
54th
El Salvador rank
54th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • El Salvador
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 54th and El Salvador ranks 54th of 181 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark El Salvador Difference Ahead
2000s 56.7 65.62 8.93 El Salvador
2010s 56.25 58.12 1.88 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Denmark or El Salvador?
Denmark, at 56.25 against 56.25 in El Salvador as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Denmark and El Salvador?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and El Salvador?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Denmark and El Salvador rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Denmark ranks 54th and El Salvador ranks 54th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.