Croatia vs Ethiopia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Croatia
46.88
in 2014
Ethiopia
46.88
in 2014
Croatia rank
88th
Ethiopia rank
88th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Croatia
  • Ethiopia
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 46.88 against 46.88 in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 88th and Ethiopia ranks 88th of 181 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Ethiopia Difference Ahead
2000s 46.88 44.2 2.68 Croatia
2010s 46.88 46.88 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Croatia or Ethiopia?
Croatia, at 46.88 against 46.88 in Ethiopia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Croatia and Ethiopia?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Ethiopia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Croatia and Ethiopia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Croatia ranks 88th and Ethiopia ranks 88th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.