Cote d'Ivoire vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Cote d'Ivoire
65.62
in 2014
South Korea
65.62
in 2014
Cote d'Ivoire rank
29th
South Korea rank
29th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- South Korea
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 65.62 against 65.62 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 29th and South Korea ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.5 | 59.38 | 3.12 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 63.75 | 64.38 | 0.625 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or South Korea?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 65.62 against 65.62 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea?
- 0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 29th and South Korea ranks 29th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.