Congo vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Congo
28.12
in 2014
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
28.12
in 2014
Congo rank
147th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
147th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Congo
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Congo currently reports 28.12 against 28.12 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 147th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 147th of 184 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.12 | 26.25 | 1.88 | Congo |
| 2010s | 28.12 | 28.12 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Congo or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Congo, at 28.12 against 28.12 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Congo and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Congo and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Congo ranks 147th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 147th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.