Chile vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Chile
53.12
in 2014
Kazakhstan
53.12
in 2014
Chile rank
63rd
Kazakhstan rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Chile
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 53.12 against 53.12 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 63rd and Kazakhstan ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.12 | 46.43 | 6.7 | Chile |
| 2010s | 53.12 | 50.62 | 2.5 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Chile or Kazakhstan?
- Chile, at 53.12 against 53.12 in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Chile and Kazakhstan?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kazakhstan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Chile and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Chile ranks 63rd and Kazakhstan ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.