Central African Republic vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Central African Republic
31.25
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
31.25
in 2014
Central African Republic rank
138th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
138th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 138th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 138th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 31.25 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 31.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Central African Republic or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Central African Republic, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Central African Republic and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 138th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 138th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.