Brazil vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Brazil
29.34
in 2014
Suriname
28.12
in 2014
Brazil rank
145th
Suriname rank
146th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Brazil
  • Suriname
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 29.34 against 28.12 in Suriname, a difference of 1.22.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Suriname ahead.

Brazil ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 146th of 181 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 25 28.12 3.12 Suriname
2010s 27.36 28.12 0.7625 Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Brazil or Suriname?
Brazil, at 29.34 against 28.12 in Suriname as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Brazil and Suriname?
1.22, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Suriname?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Brazil and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Brazil ranks 145th and Suriname ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.