Brazil vs Congo: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Brazil
29.34
in 2014
Congo
28.12
in 2014
Brazil rank
145th
Congo rank
146th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Brazil
  • Congo
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 29.34 against 28.12 in Congo, a difference of 1.22.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Congo ahead.

Brazil ranks 145th and Congo ranks 146th of 181 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 24.11 28.12 4.02 Congo
2010s 27.36 28.12 0.7625 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Brazil or Congo?
Brazil, at 29.34 against 28.12 in Congo as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Brazil and Congo?
1.22, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Brazil and Congo rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Brazil ranks 145th and Congo ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.