Botswana vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Botswana
78.12
in 2014
Iceland
81.25
in 2014
Botswana rank
12th
Iceland rank
9th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 81.25 against 78.12 in Botswana, a difference of 3.13.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75 | 81.25 | 6.25 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 77.5 | 81.25 | 3.75 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Botswana or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 81.25 against 78.12 in Botswana as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Botswana and Iceland?
- 3.13, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Botswana and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Botswana ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 9th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.