Botswana vs Czechia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Botswana
78.12
in 2014
Czechia
81.25
in 2014
Botswana rank
12th
Czechia rank
9th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • Czechia
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 81.25 against 78.12 in Botswana, a difference of 3.13.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 12th and Czechia ranks 9th of 181 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Czechia Difference Ahead
2000s 75 80.36 5.36 Czechia
2010s 77.5 81.25 3.75 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Botswana or Czechia?
Czechia, at 81.25 against 78.12 in Botswana as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Botswana and Czechia?
3.13, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Czechia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Botswana and Czechia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Botswana ranks 12th and Czechia ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.