Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
50
in 2014
Tonga
50
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
76th
Tonga rank
76th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Tonga
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 50 against 50 in Tonga, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and Tonga ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.32 | 50 | 2.68 | Tonga |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tonga?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 50 against 50 in Tonga as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tonga?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tonga?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and Tonga ranks 76th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.