Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
50
in 2014
Solomon Islands
50
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
76th
Solomon Islands rank
76th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 50 against 50 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and Solomon Islands ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.32 | 50 | 2.68 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Solomon Islands?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 50 against 50 in Solomon Islands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Solomon Islands?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and Solomon Islands ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.