Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
50
in 2014
Philippines
50
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
76th
Philippines rank
76th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Philippines
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 50 against 50 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and Philippines ranks 76th of 183 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.32 | 50 | 2.68 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Philippines?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 50 against 50 in Philippines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Philippines?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Philippines?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Philippines rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and Philippines ranks 76th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.