Bolivia vs Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Bolivia
40.62
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea
40.62
in 2014
Bolivia rank
109th
Equatorial Guinea rank
109th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Bolivia
  • Equatorial Guinea
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 40.62 against 40.62 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 109th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 40.62 40.62 0
2010s 40.62 40.62 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Bolivia or Equatorial Guinea?
Bolivia, at 40.62 against 40.62 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Bolivia and Equatorial Guinea?
0, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Equatorial Guinea?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bolivia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Bolivia ranks 109th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.