Austria vs Luxembourg: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Austria
87.5
in 2014
Luxembourg
84.38
in 2014
Austria rank
4th
Luxembourg rank
5th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Austria
  • Luxembourg
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Austria currently reports 87.5 against 84.38 in Luxembourg, a difference of 3.12.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Austria ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 181 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 85.94 84.38 1.56 Austria
2010s 87.5 84.38 3.12 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Austria or Luxembourg?
Austria, at 87.5 against 84.38 in Luxembourg as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Austria and Luxembourg?
3.12, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Luxembourg?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Austria and Luxembourg rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Austria ranks 4th and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.