Austria vs Djibouti: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Austria
87.5
in 2014
Djibouti
40.62
in 2014
Austria rank
4th
Djibouti rank
1st

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Austria
  • Djibouti
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Austria currently reports 87.5 against 40.62 in Djibouti, a difference of 46.88.

That makes Austria's figure about 2.2 times Djibouti's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 4th and Djibouti ranks 1st of 181 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Djibouti Difference Ahead
2000s 85 40.62 44.38 Austria
2010s 87.5 40.62 46.88 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Austria or Djibouti?
Austria, at 87.5 against 40.62 in Djibouti as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Austria and Djibouti?
46.88, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Djibouti?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Austria and Djibouti rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Austria ranks 4th and Djibouti ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.