Argentina vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Argentina
53.12
in 2014
Serbia
53.12
in 2014
Argentina rank
63rd
Serbia rank
63rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Argentina
  • Serbia
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 53.12 against 53.12 in Serbia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 63rd of 181 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 53.12 50.45 2.68 Argentina
2010s 53.12 53.12 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Argentina or Serbia?
Argentina, at 53.12 against 53.12 in Serbia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Argentina and Serbia?
0, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Argentina ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.