Antigua and Barbuda vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
28.12
in 2014
Palestine, State of
28.12
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
147th
Palestine, State of rank
147th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 28.12 against 28.12 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 147th and Palestine, State of ranks 147th of 184 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.25 | 28.12 | 1.88 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 28.12 | 28.12 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Palestine, State of?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 28.12 against 28.12 in Palestine, State of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Palestine, State of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Palestine, State of rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 147th and Palestine, State of ranks 147th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.