Antigua and Barbuda vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
28.12
in 2014
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
28.12
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
147th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
147th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 28.12 against 28.12 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 147th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 147th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.25 | 26.25 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 28.12 | 28.12 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 28.12 against 28.12 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 147th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 147th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.