Antigua and Barbuda vs Brazil: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
28.12
in 2014
Brazil
29.34
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
146th
Brazil rank
145th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Brazil
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 29.34 against 28.12 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 1.22.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brazil ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 146th and Brazil ranks 145th of 181 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Brazil Difference Ahead
2000s 26.25 25 1.25 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 28.12 27.36 0.7625 Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Brazil?
Brazil, at 29.34 against 28.12 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil?
1.22, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 146th and Brazil ranks 145th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.