Angola vs Dominica: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Angola
21.88
in 2014
Dominica
21.88
in 2014
Angola rank
157th
Dominica rank
157th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Angola
  • Dominica
05101520200320082014

How they compare

Angola currently reports 21.88 against 21.88 in Dominica, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 157th and Dominica ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Dominica Difference Ahead
2000s 21.88 20 1.88 Angola
2010s 21.88 21.88 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Angola or Dominica?
Angola, at 21.88 against 21.88 in Dominica as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Angola and Dominica?
0, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Dominica?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Angola and Dominica rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Angola ranks 157th and Dominica ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.