Afghanistan vs Saint Lucia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Afghanistan
21.88
in 2014
Saint Lucia
21.88
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
157th
Saint Lucia rank
157th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Saint Lucia
05101520200420092014

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 21.88 against 21.88 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 157th and Saint Lucia ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
2000s 18.75 20 1.25 Saint Lucia
2010s 20 21.88 1.88 Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Afghanistan or Saint Lucia?
Afghanistan, at 21.88 against 21.88 in Saint Lucia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Afghanistan and Saint Lucia?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Saint Lucia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Afghanistan and Saint Lucia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Afghanistan ranks 157th and Saint Lucia ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.