Afghanistan vs Angola: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Afghanistan
21.88
in 2014
Angola
21.88
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
157th
Angola rank
157th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Angola
05101520200320082014

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 21.88 against 21.88 in Angola, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 157th and Angola ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Angola Difference Ahead
2000s 18.75 21.88 3.12 Angola
2010s 20 21.88 1.88 Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Afghanistan or Angola?
Afghanistan, at 21.88 against 21.88 in Angola as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Afghanistan and Angola?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Angola?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Afghanistan and Angola rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Afghanistan ranks 157th and Angola ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.