New Zealand vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment
New Zealand
42 days
in 2019
South Sudan
45 days
in 2019
New Zealand rank
189th
South Sudan rank
187th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time
- New Zealand
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 45 days against 42 days in New Zealand, a difference of 3 days.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 189th and South Sudan ranks 187th of 191 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, New Zealand or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 45 days against 42 days in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 3 days, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
- New Zealand ranks 189th and South Sudan ranks 187th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.