New Zealand vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment
New Zealand
42 days
in 2019
Singapore
40 days
in 2019
New Zealand rank
189th
Singapore rank
190th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 42 days against 40 days in Singapore, a difference of 2 days.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 189th and Singapore ranks 190th of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 42 days against 40 days in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 2 days, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
- New Zealand ranks 189th and Singapore ranks 190th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.