FSM vs PLW: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment

FSM
400 days
in 2019
PLW
365 days
in 2019
FSM rank
10th
PLW rank
12th

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time

  • FSM
  • PLW
0100200300400201120152019

How they compare

FSM currently reports 400 days against 365 days in PLW, a difference of 35 days.

That makes FSM's figure about 1.1 times PLW's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, FSM has been ahead every year.

FSM ranks 10th and PLW ranks 12th of 188 countries.

FSM has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, FSM or PLW?
FSM, at 400 days against 365 days in PLW as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between FSM and PLW?
35 days, with FSM ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for FSM and PLW?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do FSM and PLW rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
FSM ranks 10th and PLW ranks 12th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.