Mauritius vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment

Mauritius
150 days
in 2019
Peru
175 days
in 2019
Mauritius rank
99th
Peru rank
96th

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time

  • Mauritius
  • Peru
050100150200250201120152019

How they compare

Peru currently reports 175 days against 150 days in Mauritius, a difference of 25 days.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 99th and Peru ranks 96th of 188 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, Mauritius or Peru?
Peru, at 175 days against 150 days in Mauritius as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between Mauritius and Peru?
25 days, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Peru?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
Mauritius ranks 99th and Peru ranks 96th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.