Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment
Mauritania
140 days
in 2019
Zimbabwe
149 days
in 2019
Mauritania rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
112th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time
- Mauritania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 149 days against 140 days in Mauritania, a difference of 9 days.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 188 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 149 days against 140 days in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
- 9 days, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
- Mauritania ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.