Mauritania vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment

Mauritania
140 days
in 2019
Poland
145 days
in 2019
Mauritania rank
115th
Poland rank
113th

Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time

  • Mauritania
  • Poland
050100150201120152019

How they compare

Poland currently reports 145 days against 140 days in Mauritania, a difference of 5 days.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 115th and Poland ranks 113th of 188 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, Mauritania or Poland?
Poland, at 145 days against 140 days in Mauritania as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between Mauritania and Poland?
5 days, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Poland?
9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
How do Mauritania and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
Mauritania ranks 115th and Poland ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days)
Unit
days
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,702 data points, 2011–2019
Last refreshed

The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.