Malaysia vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment
Malaysia
120 days
in 2019
Malta
125 days
in 2019
Malaysia rank
121st
Malta rank
119th
Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment over time
- Malaysia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 125 days against 120 days in Malaysia, a difference of 5 days.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 121st and Malta ranks 119th of 188 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment, Malaysia or Malta?
- Malta, at 125 days against 120 days in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment between Malaysia and Malta?
- 5 days, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Malta?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Malta rank globally for enforcing contracts: enforcement of judgment?
- Malaysia ranks 121st and Malta ranks 119th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Enforcement of judgment (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The time for enforcement of judgment captures the time from the moment the time to appeal has elapsed until the money is recovered by the winning party.